How are incrementality experiments different from A/B experiments?
They measure the relative effectiveness of different versions of a marketing campaign.
They determine the impact of ads on a consumer's decision to convert or not.
They typically require a smaller sample size and less sophisticated statistical analysis.
They do not require a holdback group to determine which version of an ad performs better.
Explanation
Analysis of Correct Answer(s)
This option is correct because the primary purpose of an incrementality experiment (also known as a lift study) is to measure the causal effect of your advertising. It answers the fundamental question: "How many conversions happened only because people saw my ads?"
- It isolates the true impact of an ad campaign by comparing a group that sees the ads (test group) with a statistically similar group that does not (the holdback or control group).
- The difference in conversion behavior between these two groups is the incremental lift, which directly measures the ad's influence on a consumer's decision to convert.
Analysis of Incorrect Options
-
"They measure the relative effectiveness of different versions of a marketing campaign.": This is the definition of an A/B experiment. A/B tests compare the performance of ad version A against version B to see which one performs better. They optimize within a campaign, while incrementality measures the campaign's overall value.
-
"They do not require a holdback group...": This is incorrect. A holdback group is the essential component of an incrementality experiment. Without a control group that is withheld from seeing the ads, it is impossible to measure the causal lift.
-
"They typically require a smaller sample size...": This is generally false. To detect a statistically significant lift, incrementality experiments often require large sample sizes and robust statistical methods, making them more complex than many standard A/B tests.